Font size:
Site colors:
Images

Settings

Font settings:

Font family: Arial Times New Roman

Letter spacing: Standard Medium Large

Color scheme:

Close panel Reset to defaults

Rating of the effectiveness of the heads of municipalities in the Rostov region to attract investment

Homepage > About the region > Rating of the effectiveness of the heads of municipalities in the Rostov region to attract investment

Evaluation of the municipalities to attract investment in the quarterly mode is in areas characterized by:

- The intensity and dynamics of investment activity in the municipality,

- The intensity and dynamics of contracting activity in the municipality,

- The intensity and dynamics of housing construction in the municipality,

- The impact of the investment processes at the level of employment of municipalities,

- The intensity and dynamics of the resulting primary indicator of economic development of the municipality - trafficking organizations

- The dynamics of the impact of the financial and economic activities of organizations in the territory of the municipality.

The methodology of the ranking otsenki.rar   
 

Rating score for the 1st half of 2012:  

 

The volume index of investment   
in fixed assets   
(Unapproved data)

 

2011 in %   to 2006

scores

Rostov-on-Don

113.9

1

Azov

297.7

5

Bataysk

159.8

2

Volgodonsk

330.6

5

Gukovo

118.8

1

Donetsk

119.0

1

Zverevo

41.9

0

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

94.5

0

Novocherkassk

254.2

4

Novoshakhtinsk

402.0

5

Taganrog

100.2

1

Mine

98.2

0

maximum

330.6

minimum

100.2

step interval

46.08

Investment in fixed assets   
per capita   
(Excluding data on micro-enterprises and the informal economy)

 

January-20 June 12, 
rubles

scores

Rostov-on-Don

18 057,8

4

Azov

16 691,5

4

Bataysk

7 718,0

2

Volgodonsk

54 401,5

5

Gukovo

4 603,5

1

Donetsk

4 326,2

1

Zverevo

3 325,6

1

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

5 504,8

1

Novocherkassk

22 071,0

5

Novoshakhtinsk

5 095,0

1

Taganrog

9 994,0

2

Mine

5 569,4

1

maximum

22 071,0

minimum

3 325,6

step interval

3 749,08

The volume index of investment   
in fixed assets  
(Excluding data on micro-enterprises and the informal economy)

 

January-June 2012   
in%   to   
January-June 2011

scores

Rostov-on-Don

109.5

1

Azov

205.7

5

Bataysk

95.4

0

Volgodonsk

201.7

5

Gukovo

123.8

1

Donetsk

99.7

0

Zverevo

108.3

1

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

150, 4

3

Novocherkassk

167.4

4

Novoshakhtinsk

139.9

2

Taganrog

84.1

0

Mine

45.2

0

maximum

205.7

minimum

108.3

step interval

19.48

Investment in fixed assets   
per capita levels of investment, excluding the largest organizations   
(Excluding data on micro-enterprises and the informal economy)

 

January-June 2012, 
rubles

scores

Rostov-on-Don

17 401,9

5

Azov

16 691,5

5

Bataysk

7 688,6

2

Volgodonsk

10 3 04,6

3

Gukovo

4 600,2

1

Donetsk

4 324,7

1

Zverevo

2 090,6

1

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

5 501,5

2

Novocherkassk

20 783,9

5

Novoshakhtinsk

5 092,8

1

Taganrog

9 385,8

3

Mine

5 491,5

2

maximum

17 401,9

minimum

2 090,6

step interval

3 062,26

The volume index of investment   
in fixed assets   excluding the largest organizations in investments   
(Excluding data on micro-enterprises and the informal economy)

 

January-June, December 20   
in%   to   
January-June 2011

scores

Rostov-on-Don

110.4

1

Azov

207.2

5

Bataysk

97.8

0

Volgodonsk

138.9

2

Gukovo

123.7

2

Donetsk

100.8

1

Zverevo

177.7

4

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

150.6

3

Novocherkassk

174.7

4

Novoshakhtinsk

140.3

2

Taganrog

83.9

0

Mine

44.6

0

maximum

207.2

minimum

100.8

step interval

21.28

The volume index of investment   
in fixed capital of municipal ownership   
  (For large, medium-sized organizations and organizations with up to 15 people)

 

January-June 2012   
in%   to   
January-June 2011

scores

Rostov-on-Don

59.6

0

Azov

304.3

5

Bataysk

2887.4

5

Volgodonsk

242.8

4

Gukovo

98.5

0

Donetsk

55.3

0

Zverevo

3332.3

5

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

132.8

1

Novocherkassk

129.7

1

Novoshakhtinsk

114.6

1

Taganrog

286.1

5

Mine

115.9

1

maximum

304.3

minimum

114.6

step interval

37.94

New housing 
per 1000 population

January-June 2012,   
square. meters   
  the total area of

scores

Rostov-on-Don

310.8

5

Azov

253.3

5

Bataysk

329.8

5

Volgodonsk

160.6

3

Gukovo

73.0

1

Donetsk

141.8

3

Zverevo

19.5

1

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

79.7

2

Novocherkassk

200.8

4

Novoshakhtinsk

48.2

1

Taganrog

193.1

3

Mine

158.8

3

maximum

310.8

minimum

19.5

step interval

58.26

The dynamics of housing all   
by municipality

 

January-June 2012   
in%   to   
January-June 2011

scores

Rostov-on-Don

86.9

0

Azov

124.9

1

Bataysk

127.3

1

Volgodonsk

99.6

0

Gukovo

70.4

0

Donetsk

129.0

1

Zverevo

71.9

0

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

190.2

5

Novocherkassk

194.9

5

Novoshakhtinsk

34.3

0

Taganrog

136.0

1

Mine

96.7

0

maximum

194.9

minimum

124.9

step interval

14.00

Volume   work performed   
by Business "Construction"   
per capita

 

January-June 2012, 
rubles

scores

Rostov-on-Don

12 727,6

5

Azov

1 708,2

1

Bataysk

8 393,2

4

Volgodonsk

28 170,2

5

Gukovo

3 338,1

2

Donetsk

1 548,9

1

Zverevo

223.3

1

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

5 255,8

3

Novocherkassk

7 438,9

3

Novoshakhtinsk

1 253,3

1

Taganrog

6 872,6

3

Mine

3 417,9

2

maximum

12 727,6

minimum

223.3

step interval

2 500,86

Dynamics of the work performed   
by Business "Construction"

 

January-June 2012   
in%   to   
January-June 2011

scores

Rostov-on-Don

98.5

0

Azov

164.7

5

Bataysk

65.8

0

Volgodonsk

152.0

5

Gukovo

73.5

0

Donetsk

90.8

0

Zverevo

98.0

0

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

113.7

1

Novocherkassk

68.3

0

Novoshakhtinsk

61.7

0

Taganrog

118.5

2

Mine

101.0

1

maximum

164.7

minimum

101.0

step interval

12.74

The turnover of the large and medium-sized organizations   
  per capita

 

January-June 2012, 
rubles

scores

Rostov-on-Don

285 993,4

5

Azov

202 713,3

5

Bataysk

77 282,4

2

Volgodonsk

189 955,6

5

Gukovo

149 429,0

4

Donetsk

23 487,0

1

Zverevo

25 686,9

1

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

104 751,7

3

Novocherkassk

156 305,7

4

Novoshakhtinsk

16 193,1

1

Taganrog

172 007,5

5

Mine

82 940,1

2

maximum

202 713,3

minimum

16 193,1

step interval

37 304,04

Dynamics of turnover   
large and medium-sized organizations   
(Comparable to a circle)

 

January-June 2012   
in%   to   
January-June 2011

scores

Rostov-on-Don

117.6

5

Azov

103.5

1

Bataysk

119.5

5

Volgodonsk

117.2

5

Gukovo

103.4

1

Donetsk

105.2

1

Zverevo

89.2

0

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

112.8

3

Novocherkassk

103.4

1

Novoshakhtinsk

111.1

3

Taganrog

105.1

1

Mine

116.4

5

maximum

119.5

minimum

103.4

step interval

3.22

Changes in the share of profitable   
large and medium-sized organizations   
(On a comparable range of organizations)

January-June 2012 to   
  January-June 2011,   
percentage points

reference   
specific gravity   
profitable enterprises,%

scores

Rostov-on-Don

-1.4

72.8

0

Azov

11.4

70.5

5

Bataysk

-6.0

66.7

0

Volgodonsk

9.7

77.8

5

Gukovo

5.3

57.9

3

Donetsk

-11.2

44.4

0

Zverevo

-50.0

-

0

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

-3.0

51.5

0

Novocherkassk

4.4

67.4

2

Novoshakhtinsk

0

61.5

1

Taganrog

1.5

62.9

1

Mine

-6.3

70.8

0

Rostov region

70.5

maximum

11.4

minimum

0

step interval

2.28

Dynamics of nominal gross   
  wages

 

June 2012 
in%   to 
June 2011

scores

Rostov-on-Don

117.9

4

Azov

116.7

3

Bataysk

113.9

2

Volgodonsk

112.8

2

Gukovo

122.7

5

Donetsk

119.9

4

Zverevo

110.1

1

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

116.9

3

Novocherkassk

120.2

5

Novoshakhtinsk

116.4

3

Taganrog

116.2

3

Mine

111.0

1

maximum

122.7

minimum

110.1

step interval

2.52

Registered unemployment   
end of period

 

June 2012,   
in%   the economically active population

scores

Rostov-on-Don

0.5

5

Azov

0.8

4

Bataysk

0.7

4

Volgodonsk

0.5

5

Gukovo

1.5

1

Donetsk

1.4

1

Zverevo

1.5

1

Kamensk Shakhtinsky

0.9

3

Novocherkassk

0.4

5

Novoshakhtinsk

1.4

1

Taganrog

0.7

4

Mine

0.8

4

maximum

1.5

minimum

0.4

step interval

0.22

Also annually held in Rostov rating of the effectiveness of the administration of the investment processes by line ministries and administrations of urban districts and municipal districts according sMetodicheskimi recommendations, endorsed the decision of Board of Administration of Rostov region from 13.09.2010 № 96 "On the evaluation of ministries and administrations of urban districts and municipal districts to ensure the effectiveness of investment and innovation. "

ArrowTop